+ Reply to Thread
Page 113 of 249 FirstFirst ... 13 63 93 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 128 133 163 213 ... LastLast
Results 1,121 to 1,130 of 2489

Thread: World of Color

  1. #1121
    The Disney Geologist guy MI Regular Member MoonRakerSCM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,779
    They do a good job hiding the massive light towers for Fantasmic during the day... There's no reason they could not have constructed pits for these and had them rise out of less obtrusive structures on the surface.

  2. #1122
    2,000 plus club member HSM fans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    New York
    Age
    17
    Posts
    2,219
    Images
    72
    ^^Well said Sparky. Now what would you rather have? Extravagant lighthouses or the wrap around boardwalk and a horrible show or nice lighthouses (which I don't think they're bad) and a great show? You can't have it both ways.
    "Here you leave today and enter the world of Yesterday, Tomorrow, and Fantasy." -Disneyland plaque above Main Street

  3. #1123
    Run, Jack, Run! PirateGuy 815's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Orange County, NY
    Age
    20
    Posts
    3,508
    Images
    366
    Quote Originally Posted by MoonRakerSCM View Post
    They do a good job hiding the massive light towers for Fantasmic during the day... There's no reason they could not have constructed pits for these and had them rise out of less obtrusive structures on the surface.
    Yeah, but that's on land, not in the water. It wouldn't have worked being underwater. And they do have those pits near the vewing terrace that are like what you suggested.

    I to wish they were more fancy, but we'll see how it looks once completely done.
    "Take What You Can, Give Nothin' Back!"- Captain Jack Sparrow

    I'm now on twitter! Follow me @pirateguy815.

  4. #1124
    The Disney Geologist guy MI Regular Member MoonRakerSCM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,779
    It's not 'underwater', it's a cement basin, by that thought the fun wheel is technically underwater, come on guys. If they built cement retaining walls around whatever mechanism would rise up and contain the show elements they could hide them inside the pit within the water no problem. Then, whatever they placed above the water surface could be much less imposing and more natural. Look at some of the show element housings for TDS... they're amazing and you don't even notice them until they open.

    They have to be where they have to be yes, but there is no reason they shouldn't look natural where they have to be. Other parks do it, why not here?

  5. #1125
    Run, Jack, Run! PirateGuy 815's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Orange County, NY
    Age
    20
    Posts
    3,508
    Images
    366
    Quote Originally Posted by KNRG View Post
    The intended version is nice and would be visually interesting.. these are crap.
    But wait, these aren't in WDW.


    Oh, snap! JK, JK- you guys knew it was coming!
    "Take What You Can, Give Nothin' Back!"- Captain Jack Sparrow

    I'm now on twitter! Follow me @pirateguy815.

  6. #1126
    MouseInfo Supporter MI Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Anaheim
    Posts
    139
    I don't know Moonraker, you'd have to ask someone who was in the know. It could be they didn't want the projectors moving up and down on a lift...or in the water - if they do plan on reprogramming the wave machine, then I don't think they want their precious equipment being compromised by water overtopping. (even 'waterproof' isn't 100% reliable)

    They made pits for the frontal projection systems...so it's not like the option wasn't considered. They had to have had a good reason to use static housing systems...we just don't know it.

  7. #1127
    The Disney Geologist guy MI Regular Member MoonRakerSCM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,779
    Up and down on a lift is no problem these days for anything, it's just cost and maintenance to keep it working properly. Overtopping? Come on guys, again. Building the surface features, whatever they could be, a few feet high would be no problem at all for water overtaking the housing.

    I notice a difference between the front systems and the back systems that may suggest cheapness or quick underthought planning... the front system housing design was included in many models and art pieces... why were the back housings not? The only place we ever saw the rear housings was that one lighthouse sheet in the BSC correct?

  8. #1128
    MouseInfo Supporter MI Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Anaheim
    Posts
    139
    I don't know how that eludes to cheapness...it just eludes to the fact that pits were not feasible for the back side and in numerous versions of the concept art, weren't included because it wasn't going to happen.

    Besides your claim of building on the cheap, theoretically what other benefits could come of the main rig being static on the surface? How about we start there.

  9. #1129
    The Disney Geologist guy MI Regular Member MoonRakerSCM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,779
    weren't included because it wasn't going to happen.
    Yeah, but neither were the 'lighthouses' yet they did happen.

  10. #1130
    Joined the Ban Wagon KNRG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Tampon, FL
    Age
    30
    Posts
    4,817
    Images
    13
    Am I the only one who can see that these things are ugly and that Disney had a better design that they chose not to go with?

    It may not have been perfect but the chosen design is much further from perfect - they're boring. They look like a crappy autocad 3D student drafting of the more whimsical design but dumbed down because they don't know how to use various curve and spline tools properly to create the more whimsical look.

    Seriously.

    As for synchrolites - why are they there? Epcot hides them around the lagoon atop buildings in World showcase behind their facades - you only ever see them when they come up a little early in the evening before sunset. They're atop france and norway and the innoventions buildings (and others). I would think in the DCA lagoon that close to the audience they're going to be blinding. I'm really curious as to why they're physically in the lagoon.

    (If you hit the company's website, Epcot is listed first in their example of installations in the "about us" section, apparently they're quite proud of those.)


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Bringing World of Color Together
    By dlfreak in forum Announcements by Disney
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-21-2010, 01:15 PM
  2. Another World of Color Construction Video!
    By dlfreak in forum Announcements by Disney
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-18-2010, 11:44 AM
  3. World of Color Testing
    By dlfreak in forum MI Pictorials
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 06:22 PM
  4. July 1, 2009 - World of Color, Paradise Pier, and more
    By dlfreak in forum DLR News and Info
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-15-2009, 02:56 PM
  5. Wonderful World of Color: Pirates of the Caribean
    By DL Adventurer in forum Disneyland Resort
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-07-2004, 08:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts